Most Popular Web Hosting Companies
Here is a list of the most popular web hosting companies, determined by the number of reviews each has received. These companies have an extensive user base, reflecting their widespread use in the hosting industry.
Ratings and reviews are sourced from Trustpilot as a metric called TrustScore. A TrustScore is the overall measurement of reviewer satisfaction. Learn more about TrustScore here.
Web Hosting Companies with the Most Users
The most popular web hosting company is GoDaddy with a rating of 4.6 stars from 120,778 customer reviews.
List of the Most Popular Web Hosts
Below, you will find web hosting companies with 1,000 reviews or more. The high volume of reviews for these companies indicates their popularity, regardless of whether the customer feedback is positive or negative.
| # | Web Hosting Company | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
GoDaddy |
4.6 |
120,778 |  |
Tempe, Arizona, United States |
| 2 |
|
Hostinger |
4.7 |
45,182 |  |
Kaunas, Lithuania |
| 3 |
|
IONOS |
4.6 |
29,250 |  |
Montabaur, Germany |
| 4 |
|
Wix |
4.4 |
24,076 |  |
Tel Aviv, Israel |
| 5 |
|
SiteGround |
4.8 |
21,264 |  |
Sofia, Bulgaria |
| 6 |
|
BlueHost |
4.3 |
20,082 | |
Jacksonville, Florida, United States |
| 7 |
|
Namecheap |
4.3 |
18,227 | |
Phoenix, Arizona, United States |
| 8 |
|
Porkbun |
4.8 |
17,523 | |
Sherwood, Oregon, United States |
| 9 |
|
HostGator |
4.6 |
13,792 | |
Houston, Texas, United States |
| 10 |
|
SITE123 |
4.1 |
8,900 | |
Beersheba, Israel |
| 11 |
|
DreamHost |
4.7 |
7,157 | |
Brea, California, United States |
| 12 |
|
Crazy Domains |
4.5 |
6,679 |  |
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia |
| 13 |
|
Square |
4.3 |
6,133 | |
San Francisco, California, United States |
| 14 |
|
Miss Hosting |
4.7 |
5,646 |  |
Stockholm, Sweden |
| 15 |
|
names.co.uk |
3.8 |
4,939 |  |
Worcester, England, United Kingdom |
| 16 |
|
Network Solutions |
4.6 |
3,890 | |
Jacksonville, Florida, United States |
| 17 |
|
A2 Hosting |
4.6 |
3,768 | |
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States |
| 18 |
|
Mochahost |
4.7 |
3,581 | |
San Jose, California, United States |
| 19 |
|
Domain.com |
4.4 |
3,557 | |
Jacksonville, Florida, United States |
| 20 |
|
WPX |
4.9 |
3,527 | |
Sofia, Bulgaria |
| 21 |
|
WordPress.com |
1.5 |
3,476 | |
San Francisco, California, United States |
| 22 |
|
Shopify |
1.3 |
3,288 |  |
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| 23 |
|
FastComet |
4.6 |
2,949 | |
Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| 24 |
|
Cloudways |
4.5 |
2,880 |  |
Saint Julian's, Malta |
| 25 |
|
Web.com |
4.2 |
2,719 | |
Jacksonville, Florida, United States |
| 26 |
|
Netim |
4.9 |
2,457 |  |
Lille, France |
| 27 |
|
Canva |
2.4 |
2,427 | |
Surry Hills, New South Wales, Australia |
| 28 |
|
Dynadot |
4.5 |
2,397 | |
San Mateo, California, United States |
| 29 |
|
HostPapa |
4.7 |
2,389 | |
Burlington, Ontario, Canada |
| 30 |
|
Name.com |
4.4 |
2,350 | |
Denver, Colorado, United States |
| 31 |
|
InMotion Hosting |
4.2 |
2,094 | |
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States |
| 32 |
|
InterServer |
4.3 |
2,061 | |
Secaucus, New Jersey, United States |
| 33 |
|
10Web |
4.8 |
2,010 | |
Newark, Delaware, United States |
| 34 |
|
ScalaHosting |
5.0 |
2,004 | |
Dallas, Texas, United States |
| 35 |
|
WP Engine |
4.5 |
1,539 | |
Austin, Texas, United States |
| 36 |
|
Liquid Web |
4.3 |
1,463 | |
Lansing, Michigan, United States |
| 37 |
|
Squarespace |
1.2 |
1,441 | |
New York, New York, United States |
| 38 |
|
GreenGeeks |
4.5 |
1,279 | |
Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| 39 |
|
Vodien |
4.6 |
1,198 |  |
Singapore, Singapore |
| 40 |
|
Nexcess |
4.6 |
1,063 | |
Southfield, Michigan, United States |
| 41 |
|
InfinityFree |
3.9 |
1,063 |  |
Zeist, Netherlands |
| 42 |
|
HostArmada |
4.8 |
1,013 | |
Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| 43 |
|
Webnode |
4.3 |
1,007 |  |
Brno, Czech Republic |
Popular Doesn't Always Mean Best
When evaluating these popular web hosting companies, also consider their rating to strike a balance between quality and reputation. View top-rated web hosting companies ranked by the overall rating of their customers.